Services
From makeovers to personalized skincare consultations
From makeovers to personalized skincare consultations
Get inspired, play with products & learn new skills
Exciting launches, parties & more
Explore what's hot in your store
Ask questions, join challenges, and get recommendations from people like you
Discover topics tailored to your beauty interests
Add your photos and get inspired by fellow beauty lovers
View activity, savings and benefits
Redeem items, samples and more
View and track online orders
Reorder it from in-store and online purchases
View saved products
Recommendations from your store visits
Manage your services, classes and events
Complete your beauty traits for personalized recommendations
Payments, contact info, addresses and password
View activity, savings and benefits
Redeem items, samples and more
View and track online orders
Reorder it from in-store and online purchases
View saved products
Recommendations from your store visits
Manage your services, classes and events
Complete your beauty traits for personalized recommendations
Payments, contact info, addresses and password
Ask questions, join challenges, and get recommendations from people like you
Discover topics tailored to your beauty interests
Add your photos and get inspired by fellow beauty lovers
From makeovers to personalized skincare consultations
Get inspired, play with products & learn new skills
Exciting launches, parties & more
Explore what's hot in your store
~ Updated Dec 23rd 2020 ~
A place to talk about beauty news... anything that doesn't have a specific thread. For upcoming releases, product updates and brand threads see the links below.
Thanks to everyone who contributes to this thread!
UPCOMING RELEASES
2021 RELEASES THREAD
https://community.sephora.com/t5/Beauty-Confidential/2021-PRODUCT-RELEASES-THREAD/m-p/5692691
FALL-WINTER & HOLIDAY RELEASES
FOUND IN THE WILD THREAD
(links to new products for purchase at Sephora)
https://community.sephora.com/t5/Trending-Now/FOUND-IN-THE-WILD-THREAD/m-p/5157361
CANADIAN PRODUCT THREAD
(links to new products for purchase at Sephora)
https://community.sephora.com/t5/Oh-Canada/What-s-New-On-The-Site-Today-Canada/td-p/2164948
BRAND THREADS
Old Beauty News Thread
#Gosh 😊 I Hope This Comment Isn't Too Controversial - Forgive Me If I'm Not Allowed To Post About It!
Now That The United States Federal Government Has Chosen To #ReScheduleMarijuana , Do You Think That Will Reduce Obstacles Or Add More Barriers Within The Beauty Industry? 🛍
I'm Eager To Know What You All Think! 💗
@miss8 Hmm… hemp (CBD) is already federally legal for cosmetics, as long as it’s no stronger than 0.3% THC. I’m not sure that’ll change if marijuana is moved from schedule I to schedule III, especially since the move wouldn’t legalize marijuana across the US. This proposed schedule change is more for medical purposes than cosmetic.
You might wanna remove those links you posted. We’re not allowed to post non-Sephora links here on BIC. You could replace them with the article titles; just say “search for MSN article [article title]” or something.
@WinglessOne , I Agree - The United States Food & Drug Agency (FDA), Health and Human Services (HHS), and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Would Have The Final Say When It Comes To What Goes Onto Our Person And Into Our Cosmestics.
Which Is Why I'm Curious ... Will More Companies And / Or Influencers Take Advantage Of The " Change " , Or Is It (As Mentioned) Irrelevant To The Industry?
I Almost Forgot To Add #ALinkForReference 😂
President Trump To Reschedule Cannabis As Less Dangerous Drug
Sunscreen news: the FDA might finally approve Tinosorb S for use in American sunscreens. Tinosorb S is also known as bemotrizinol or bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine/BEMT. It’s one of the modern broad spectrum UV filters used in European and Asian sunscreens. It’s under FDA consideration right now—and the public comment period’s open through January 26, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET.
FDA press release (italics = my own notes) :
FDA Proposes Expanding Sunscreen Active Ingredient List
For Immediate Release:
December 11, 2025
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it is taking action to advance sunscreen innovation, part of a broader initiative in the Office of Nonprescription Drugs. The agency is proposing to add bemotrizinol as a permitted active ingredient for use in sunscreens.
Based on the data reviewed by the FDA, bemotrizinol provides protection against both ultraviolet A and B rays, has low levels of absorption through the skin into the body, and rarely causes skin irritation. If this action is finalized, bemotrizinol will be an additional sunscreen active ingredient that the FDA considers to be generally recognized as safe and effective for use by adults and children 6 months of age and older, expanding consumer choice.
“The agency has historically moved too slowly in this area, leaving Americans with fewer options than consumers abroad. We’re continuing to modernize the regulation of sunscreen and other over-the-counter drug products,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “Americans deserve timely access to the best safe, effective, and consumer-friendly over-the-counter products available.”
An over-the-counter (OTC) monograph drug, such as a sunscreen product, can enter the market without an approved drug application if it meets certain requirements, including conditions established in its monograph such as permitted active ingredients, uses, and doses. The FDA can modify an OTC monograph through an administrative order (proposed and final), and a drug company may start the process by submitting an OTC Monograph Order Request (OMOR).
Within this context, DSM Nutritional Products LLC submitted a request that the FDA add bemotrizinol, at concentrations up to 6 percent, as a new active ingredient in the OTC monograph for sunscreens. While bemotrizinol has been marketed as a sunscreen ingredient in many countries, the FDA has not previously approved an application for a drug product containing bemotrizinol nor added it to the sunscreen monograph.
The FDA regulates sunscreens to ensure they meet safety and effectiveness standards. Broad spectrum sunscreens that are SPF15 or higher help prevent sunburn and reduce the risks of skin cancer and early skin aging caused by the sun, if products are used as directed with other protective measures, such as wearing protective clothing and limiting time in the sun. Given the recognized public health benefits of sunscreen use, the FDA encourages Americans to use sunscreen with other sun protective measures.
“Bemotrizinol would be a welcome addition to the current array of effective sunscreen active ingredients already available to American consumers” said Karen Murry, M.D., Acting Director of the Office of Nonprescription Drugs. “The reforms to the monograph drug system contained in the CARES Act have greatly streamlined the monograph drug regulatory process, and we look forward to working with other companies on bringing products containing other new active ingredients to market for a wide array of conditions in multiple therapeutic areas, in a much more timely fashion than was possible in the past.”
The FDA is seeking public comments on this proposed order. Instructions on how to submit comments are in the proposed order available on OTC Monographs@FDA [note: that’s the name of a website, not an email address]. If FDA concludes bemotrizinol is generally recognized as safe and effective as a sunscreen active ingredient, the agency will issue a final order to add the ingredient to OTC Monograph M020.
How to comment (to the FDA) on this proposal:
Note: below the email address field, you can make your comment anonymous if you prefer. If you do that, the email address and contact info fields will disappear. If you decide to use your email address and name, note that the address and phone number fields are optional. I don’t recommend giving your phone number; that info could end up publicly disclosed online in relation to this docket. Your email address will be kept private though.
And yes, I’m going to submit a comment. I want us to get even more updated UV filters that are photostable, unlike avobenzone; this would remove the need for photo-stabilizing UV filters that some folks are skin-sensitive to. I almost can’t believe the FDA’s actually considering this, and on a rather short timeline. 🤯
@WinglessOne interesting; thanks for sharing! It kind of seems crazy that sunscreen regulations can be so different in different countries. But I am all for us having access to as many effective sunscreens/ingredients as possible, so that hopefully there will be something that works for everyone.
@caitbird The regulation differences are even crazier when you consider the EU: their regs are mostly a mashup of different EU member regs. Yet their process still seems faster than ours in the US because the FDA is soooo sloooow and stubborn—and that was long before the current administration started messing with things.
But yeah, I’m excited to see Tinosorb S in approval consideration! Since it’s broad spectrum, it’s a good option for folks who don’t like zinc oxide sunscreens that leave a white cast on skin and/or feel very greasy. Tinosorbs can also leave a cast (Tinosorb M, for instance, likes to pool white in my forehead scar) but, on me, not as noticeably as zinc oxide does. And it’d be nice to be able to buy US sunscreens with newer filters instead of hunting down the European and Asian versions from overseas retailers, and now having to pay customs on ‘em.
@veronika23 , @TeamBIC & #Others 🤠 Tell Me You All Have An #IPSYCollab In The Pipe Works 😋
#IPSY #Sephora
Sharing a Business of Fashion article from March 2025 (updated in April) about some of Pat McGrath Labs’s troubles. I mentioned the article in theSephora Savings Event – Holiday 2025 Shopping Advice Thread: What’s in Your Basket? thread and told @teufel I’d post it later.
UPDATE: open the spoiler tag below to read the entire thing in text format. (I converted all those screenshots to text. Apologies if I missed any conversion errors.)
What Happened to Pat McGrath Labs?
By BRENNAN KILBANE, Business of Fashion, 10 March 2025
The brand founded by the legendary makeup artist nearly a decade ago is struggling. Once valued at over $1 billion, the line is worth a fraction of that today. Multiple rounds of layoffs, and signs of behind-the-scenes turmoil raise questions about what went wrong and how the business can get back on track.
If Pat McGrath is makeup's mother, then she recently taught her children a valuable lesson about delayed gratification.
The Maison Margiela couture show on Jan. 25, 2024, held beneath the Pont Alexandre III and inspired by Brassaï's photographs of Paris, was a feast of textures - John Galliano's dusty, gauzy and wooly silhouettes, of course, but also the models' otherworldly skin, which reflected a pearlescent, plasticine sheen crafted by McGrath.
Plenty of McGrath's looks had gone viral pre-and post-Instagram, like her era-defining i-D covers of the 1990s or the African-inspired masks she crafted in jewels for Givenchy in 2013. All of them paled in comparison to the response to the Margiela show. Google searches for McGrath spiked, and speculation mounted about an upcoming product launch that would allow anyone to replicate what was quickly becoming known as McGrath's "glass skin."
This was news to the team at McGrath's brand, which hadn't been working on one.
After the show, a team scrambled to put together an online masterclass with McGrath breaking down the look in February. But they were scooped by the makeup artist and beauty historian Erin Parsons, who posted a TikTok on the following Sunday explaining the theatrical trick (a drugstore peel-off face mask administered via airbrush).
According to three former employees, McGrath was annoyed about Parsons' video, not least because Parsons had once worked as her first assistant. Still, five days passed before she appeared live on Tik Tok and Instagram to share her no-longer-secret technique.
"I've never seen a makeup look go so viral," she told the tens of thousands who had gathered to watch. The tens of thousands, in turn, wondered when they might be able to try it for themselves.
But it would be another year almost to the day before those wishes would be granted. Skin Fetish: Glass 001 Artistry Mask went on sale on Pat McGrath Labs' website on Jan. 30 of this year, promising not only to replicate the Margiela show look, but to provide skincare benefits as well.
It arrived to a chorus of "THANK YOU MOTHER" and "GIVE IT TO ME!!" from McGrath's children on Instagram. (In a turn of phrase borrowed from the queer ballroom scene, her friends took to calling her Mother in the 1990s; now her fans do too). But some in her flock couldn't help but wonder why they were being asked to buy a $38 version of a peel-off mask, its perfect sheen prone to bubbling if the wearer opens their mouth.
And most importantly, what took so long?
The episode is the latest example of the difficulty Pat McGrath Labs has had translating its founder's artistic genius into commercial success. The brand set the template for the current makeup artist-driven beauty moment, securing a wall at Sephora and a $1 billion valuation with an investment from French firm Eurazeo within three years of its 2015 launch.
Maintaining that momentum proved difficult almost from the moment Pat McGrath Labs received its unicorn valuation. A permanent collection designed for the brand's Sephora entrance, heavy on the eyes and complexion, developed a cult following, but produced few hits, particularly as the minimal "clean girl" trend took hold early in the pandemic.
McGrath's famously private persona also started to feel of another era in a time when brand founders are constantly interacting with fans online. Since the pandemic, her line has struggled to compete with a host of celebrity and influencer-fronted brands, including makeup artist offerings such as Charlotte Tilbury and Bobbi Brown's Jones Road. Both regularly make themselves available for social posts and customer meet and greets.
McGrath declined through a spokesperson to comment for this story.
Eurazeo quietly exited the brand in 2021. The same year, Sienna Investment Managers, the alternative investment arm of Belgian holding firm GBL, purchased a 14.4 percent stake for €168 million ($183 million), valuing the company at €1.2 billion. One year later, it wrote down that investment by 88 percent, and in 2024 estimated its stake was worth €21.5 million, implying a total company valuation of €149 million, according to GBL's annual reports. Whereas Eurazeo executives touted Pat McGrath Labs in interviews as forming the foundation of a global beauty empire, GBL has never spoken about its investment publicly, referring to it in documents as an unnamed "cosmetics company."
Meanwhile, the brand's door count at Sephora has fallen steadily since 2019, and when Ulta Beauty picked up the line in 2023, it did so in just 200 of its 1,400 North American stores, Puck News reported. Some fans have recently spotted Pat McGrath Labs products at discount retailers like Ross Dress for Less. According to a Pat McGrath Labs spokesperson, the brand is carried in over 700 retail doors worldwide.
In 2024, the company held three rounds of layoffs. Last month, senior executive Rabih Hamdan announced his departure after less than a year at the company in a letter to staff that suggested turbulence behind the scenes.
"The environment that I had stepped into was not exactly what was depicted to me (and in all fairness I think no one really had the proper grip of the full situation)," wrote Hamdan, who joined the company from the Italian mass cosmetics label Kiko Milano. Though Hamdan identified himself as CEO of Pat McGrath Labs on his LinkedIn page, the brand spokesperson said "Pat McGrath is and has always been the only CEO of Pat McGrath Labs."
A Working Makeup Artist Like No Other
McGrath is, without hyperbole, an industry legend; her signature black turtleneck and headband, almost nunlike, make her the avatar of the working makeup artist. Her career was made backstage at fashion shows, where she has painted faces just about every season since the early 1990s. She still does about 50 shows annually.
She is also the go-to makeup artist for luxury brands looking to make a splash in the beauty category, having helped designer labels craft best-selling products, like Armani's Luminous Silk Foundation and Diorshow Mascara. Last week, she was named the creative director of Louis Vuitton's forthcoming makeup line.
The launch of her own makeup line in 2015 was both long-awaited and perfectly timed. It was the golden hour for direct-to-consumer beauty businesses, just before the dawn of the celebrity and makeup artist boom. McGrath, the most famous artist of her kind, was ready to level up.
She was a trailblazer in other ways. McGrath is a Black woman in a mostly white industry that, despite its liberal bona fides, has deeply entrenched power dynamics. McGrath propped open the door for brands like Rihanna's Fenty, which arrived with its standard-setting 40 shade foundation range two years after Labs. McGrath also paved the way for makeup artist-led labels, like those from Gucci Westman, Patrick Ta and Mario Dedivanovic.
In 2015, however, much of the initial excitement around Pat McGrath Labs was the promise of a direct pipeline between runway artistry and the mainstream cosmetics market. Her first product, Gold 001, was a gold pigment that when mixed with an included solution produced a foil-effect on the skin. Its initial run of 1,000 sold out in six minutes. Just months after McGrath created red glitter lips at Versace's 2016 couture show, she released Lust 004, a kit to recreate the look.
For all of her bombastic Instagram captions - which favour all-caps exclamations like MAJOR or DIVINE GODDESS - and general flair for runway dramatics, McGrath, the person, is famously reserved. She often declines interviews, and recently turned down an appearance in Vogue's Hulu docuseries about the 1990s - an era whose look she helped define - according to a former employee. The artist has made more of an effort in the past year to meet her audience IRL, hosting live masterclasses and appearing at Allure's Best of Beauty event.
Backstage at her eponymous company, the exacting standards and mercurial tendencies that facilitated strokes of genius at fashion weeks made Pat McGrath Labs a difficult place to work, six former employees told The Business of Beauty.
Several described waiting until hours after sunset for McGrath's approvals, a gruelling routine which was a point of pride for the brand and its supporters. Alison Hahn, the Sephora merchandiser who helped launch Pat McGrath Labs into the retailer in 2017, once told Allure that the artist would start meetings at midnight.
"Everything's done at the last minute. That's how she works," Hahn told the magazine in 2021, adding "it's worth it."
The long hours may have also been indicative of deeper problems in the company's culture, and its executive leadership in particular.
In interviews, former employees' complaints tend to coalesce around a single figure: a senior executive, whose official title is senior vice president of marketing but who is better known as McGrath's "chief of staft." The senior executive, a former casting agent who worked out of the company's New York headquarters, is often the go-between between employees, collaborators and McGrath.
"He was aggressive, abusive, and inappropriate," one longtime employee said.
Anything that made the senior executive feel out of the loop - such as edits to an Instagram video he didn't see, or an email he was left off of - could provoke his rage, which was sometimes unleashed on the brand's predominantly young, female workplace, said six former employees.
Two employees said they made McGrath aware of the senior executive's behaviour on separate occasions, and one said they filed a complaint with human resources at the founder's recommendation. That employee said that when he later checked on the status of the complaint, HR had no record of it.
A spokesperson for the brand said, "The company takes any allegation of aggression or misconduct in the workplace very seriously and will be investigating immediately."
The senior executive and Robert Barr, a West Coast-based copywriter and marketer who helped with editorial projects like naming, formed part of an advisory team around McGrath that, one former senior employee said, functioned as an echo chamber for the artist's ideas. This delivered, in theory, a purer version of her vision - but also a culture that obstructed constructive conversations. Another longtime employee added that the arrangement helped create a stifling atmosphere of secrecy at the business.
Employees were discouraged from sharing information about what they were working on, even with others at the company not in their immediate circle, four employees said. One employee recalled members of leadership assigning multiple teams of creatives, marketers or product developers to unknowingly "compete" on the same project.
"We were pitted against each other," the employee said.
The brand declined to comment on "personnel matters." The senior executive did not respond to multiple requests for comment made via the company, his email, LinkedIn and personal Instagram account.
The Glow Down
The high-pressure working environments that powered a bygone fashion era have triggered intense burnout in this one. At Pat McGrath Labs, late nights and mad dashes contributed to quick employee turnover, which may help explain why the brand has never lived up to the expectations set by that $1 billion valuation.
The brand became known for doing things at the last minute, sometimes relying on airlifting its Mothership palettes from China to be filled in Italy before arriving at stores at enormous cost. Glass 001's rollout indicates the brand continues to struggle with its supply chain:
According to Puck News, around 100 units were available for sale on launch day; after this run sold out, the mask was again made available on the brand's website, and has had "subsequent sales of many thousands of units," the company said.)
Using product launches to drive sales is a fragile strategy for any beauty business, but especially one prone to as much change as Pat McGrath Labs. This risk was amplified by the brand's taste for Vogue-tier production in its marketing. Multiple employees brought up, by way of example, a Steven Meisel campaign that was planned in 2022 to promote the brand's first skincare launch, the Divine Skin rose essence.
McGrath had wanted to enter the category with a bang, biding her time until Estée Lauder released the patent on the formula she wanted and celebrating with a AAA-talent photo shoot.
Starring Naomi Campbell, sources say the shoot cost over $1 million, but enjoyed limited returns. A 20-second ad spot on YouTube has just over 3,000 views.
"Nobody saw it," one employee said. (The brand said that Campbell "participated in multiple global press events, content shoots, broadcast appearances, including CNN and Access Hollywood, as well as live streams across social media.")
The essence, which retails for $86, is available at Bergdorf Goodman, Ulta Beauty and Revolve. According to the brand, it will launch at Sephora online this month and in stores in the second quarter. Sephora did not respond to requests for comment.
Facing Forward
Even employees who said they felt sure in their decision to leave the company still felt uneasy about their departure, unable to neatly pack and stow a key item of baggage: their love for Mother.
"Everyone who's left has always been in awe of seeing Pat do her job," one employee said. "They want her to be a success."
Many employees, even those who had negative experiences with the company, expressed sympathy for McGrath, who they see as an artist, not an operator.
"She's a creative," said another employee. "What's happened is the people who she had come on to help her create a business have failed her:"
The respect and admiration that McGrath has cultivated over three decades in the fashion and beauty industries, as well as her famous work ethic, ensure her individual longevity - the proof is in her Louis Vuitton appointment. As for her namesake business, four former employees recommended that McGrath and her inner circle cede operational control to more capable businesspeople who can help her more effectively do what she does best; the art of makeup.
Pat McGrath Labs is plugging ahead with its 2025 launch pipeline, following Glass Skin with a limited collection in partnership with the mobile game Candy Crush.
In his farewell email, Hamdan, the outgoing senior executive, alluded to a recent course correction, writing that "it required many hard decisions to be taken promptly to set the fundamentals for a swift and sustainable turnaround," before thanking McGrath "for her involvement and endorsement of all the actions that needed to be taken."
"As we all know," he wrote, "nothing has happened since the inception of this brand nor happens now without her approval."
Editor's Note: This article was amended on 10 April 2025 to remove the name of a senior executive at Pat McGrath Labs and certain allegations. This change follows the denial of the allegations by the executive's legal representatives received after the publication of the article. The Business of Fashion stands by its original reporting.
If these images are blurry, click/tap ‘em to open them full size and (hopefully) uncompressed. You may need to pinch & zoom if you’re on a phone—or just read the text version in the spoiler tag above.
@WinglessOne , Are You #Supporting And #Downloading Their #PartnershipApp 📡📲
Three rounds of layoffs is a shame 😞 @WinglessOne @greeneyedgirl107
@curlychiquita Yeah, the layoffs both surprised and didn’t surprise me when I first read the article. “Didn’t surprise” because my former employer (a much larger company in a completely different field) routinely did at least two rounds of layoffs (for hourly and salaried employees) a year for several years. It got so bad, we all knew which months would be layoff announcement months and braced for bad news. So I’m kinda used to that crap. But also, “surprised” because somehow I didn’t expect to hear about that happening at Pat McGrath Labs… I didn’t think the brand was in that much trouble. Yikes.
I got part of the article from Reddit. If anyone is having trouble reading the initial post like I did, try tapping on the image then select preview image...only then could I enlarge significantly.
What Happened to Pat McGrath Labs?
The brand founded by the legendary makeup artist nearly a decade ago is struggling. Once valued at over $1 billion, the line is worth a fraction of that today. Multiple rounds of layoffs, and signs of behind-the-scenes turmoil raise questions about what went wrong and how the business can get back on track.
If Pat McGrath is makeup’s mother, then she recently taught her children a valuable lesson about delayed gratification.
The Maison Margiela couture show on Jan. 25, 2024, held beneath the Pont Alexandre III and inspired by Brassaï’s photographs of Paris, was a feast of textures — John Galliano’s dusty, gauzy and wooly silhouettes, of course, but also the models’ otherworldly skin, which reflected a pearlescent, plasticine sheen crafted by McGrath.
Plenty of McGrath’s looks had gone viral pre- and post-Instagram, like her era-defining i-D covers of the 1990s or the African-inspired masks she crafted in jewels for Givenchy in 2013. All of them paled in comparison to the response to the Margiela show. Google searches for McGrath spiked, and speculation mounted about an upcoming product launch that would allow anyone to replicate what was quickly becoming known as McGrath’s “glass skin.”
This was news to the team at McGrath’s brand, which hadn’t been working on one.
After the show, a team scrambled to put together an online masterclass with McGrath breaking down the look in February. But they were scooped by the makeup artist and beauty historian Erin Parsons, who posted a TikTok on the following Sunday explaining the theatrical trick (a drugstore peel-off face mask administered via airbrush).
According to three former employees, McGrath was annoyed about Parsons’ video, not least because Parsons had once worked as her first assistant. Still, five days passed before she appeared live on TikTok and Instagram to share her no-longer-secret technique.
“I’ve never seen a makeup look go so viral,” she told the tens of thousands who had gathered to watch. The tens of thousands, in turn, wondered when they might be able to try it for themselves.
But it would be another year almost to the day before those wishes would be granted. Skin Fetish: Glass 001 Artistry Mask went on sale on Pat McGrath Labs’ website on Jan. 30 of this year, promising not only to replicate the Margiela show look, but to provide skincare benefits as well.
It arrived to a chorus of “THANK YOU MOTHER” and “GIVE IT TO ME!!” from McGrath’s children on Instagram. (In a turn of phrase borrowed from the queer ballroom scene, her friends took to calling her Mother in the 1990s; now her fans do too). But some in her flock couldn’t help but wonder why they were being asked to buy a $38 version of a peel-off mask, its perfect sheen prone to bubbling if the wearer opens their mouth.
And most importantly, what took so long?
The episode is the latest example of the difficulty Pat McGrath Labs has had translating its founder’s artistic genius into commercial success. The brand set the template for the current makeup artist-driven beauty moment, securing a wall at Sephora and a $1 billion valuation with an investment from French firm Eurazeo within three years of its 2015 launch.
Maintaining that momentum proved difficult almost from the moment Pat McGrath Labs received its unicorn valuation. A permanent collection designed for the brand’s Sephora entrance, heavy on the eyes and complexion, developed a cult following, but produced few hits, particularly as the minimal “clean girl” trend took hold early in the pandemic.
McGrath’s famously private persona also started to feel of another era in a time when brand founders are constantly interacting with fans online. Since the pandemic, her line has struggled to compete with a host of celebrity and influencer-fronted brands, including makeup artist offerings such as Charlotte Tilbury and Bobbi Brown’s Jones Road. Both regularly make themselves available for social posts and customer meet and greets.
McGrath declined through a spokesperson to comment for this story.
Eurazeo quietly exited the brand in 2021. The same year, Sienna Investment Managers, the alternative investment arm of Belgian holding firm GBL, purchased a 14.4 percent stake for €168 million ($183 million), valuing the company at €1.2 billion. One year later, it wrote down that investment by 88 percent, and in 2024 estimated its stake was worth €21.5 million, implying a total company valuation of €149 million, according to GBL’s annual reports. Whereas Eurazeo executives touted Pat McGrath Labs in interviews as forming the foundation of a global beauty empire, GBL has never spoken about its investment publicly, referring to it in documents as an unnamed “cosmetics company.”
Meanwhile, the brand’s door count at Sephora has fallen steadily since 2019, and when Ulta Beauty picked up the line in 2023, it did so in just 200 of its 1,400 North American stores, Puck News reported. Some fans have recently spotted Pat McGrath Labs products at discount retailers like Ross Dress for Less. According to a Pat McGrath Labs spokesperson, the brand is carried in over 700 retail doors worldwide.
In 2024, the company held three rounds of layoffs. Last month, senior executive Rabih Hamdan announced his departure after less than a year at the company in a letter to staff that suggested turbulence behind the scenes.
"The environment that I had stepped into was not exactly what was depicted to me (and in all fairness I think no one really had the proper grip of the full situation),” wrote Hamdan, who joined the company from the Italian mass cosmetics label Kiko Milano. Though Hamdan identified himself as CEO of Pat McGrath Labs on his LinkedIn page, the brand spokesperson said “Pat McGrath is and has always been the only CEO of Pat McGrath Labs.”
In order to secure its future, Pat McGrath Labs will need to do much more than recalibrate its launch strategy; it will also need to meaningfully address a fractured company culture. The Business of Beauty spoke with eight former employees and collaborators who described an at times chaotic working atmosphere where verbal — and allegedly in at least one instance, physical — altercations were common, campaign planning was erratic, secrecy was everything and McGrath was always right, no matter the cost.
“It really is the Wild West,” said one former employee, an industry veteran. “And no one has any checks or balances.”
@WinglessOne im really interested in this, but when I tap on it the font is only a little bigger. I tried to Google it but you need to be subscribed to read the article. Maybe I'll try later with a magnifying 🔎
@greeneyedgirl107 Sorry about that. I took all those screenshots via phone months ago, so there’s only so much I can do about the font size. Whenever I tap an image on BIC on my phone, I just use my fingers to zoom in and enlarge if needed.
You could try going through the Internet Archive site’s Wayback Machine to read the whole thing online.
@WinglessOne my phone never let's me zoom in much when I tap on the image. I tried a quick search via wayback but it didn't work...I'll have to try when I'm not busy at work. I did a quick google search and it seemed like some highlights included Pat keeping herself private, a hostile work environment, repetitive rose palettes and controversy over where products were made.
What always stood out to me was that I was super interested in PMG but the line wasn't at my Sephora. When Ulta announced it was selling the brand, there was only a teeny tiny free standing display with just a few products; it disappeared quickly. I always felt that if the brand was in brick and mortar stores that people like me would get to know it better. There are so many lippies of hers that I would have liked to swatch.
@greeneyedgirl107 Alright, I converted everything from image to text. See the spoiler tag in my original post to read the whole article. 😉 Honestly I should’ve just copy/pasted the article when I read it months ago, so anyone using a screenreader (blind and visually impaired folks) could still consume it.
Something Pat’s ex-employees said in the article confirms what I’ve been thinking: Pat needs someone trustworthy to be the operational officer—a dang good COO—in partnership with her as the CEO & creative officer. She needs someone who can let her keep full creative control. That COO should not be a barrier between Pat and employees who need to interact with her though. (Sounds like that’s what’s happening with a certain allegedly hostile exec employee BoF unnamed in their article for legal reasons.) Considering how she apparently really does want everything done her way, Chief Ops Officer is probably a very challenging role. 😅
But that also tells me she does still have creative control. For a long time, I thought her investors might be calling too many shots. Apparently I was wrong.
Sorry to hear your Ulta lost Pat McGrath. 😞 The brand is in brick and mortar stores, just not as many as some other brands. I know it’s frustrating when you reeeally wanna swatch something before buying it. I still haven’t bought any Jones Road items because (to my knowledge right now) the only store in my city that carries the brand is in an outta-the-way neighborhood, and I haven’t trekked all the way out there in a long time. Eh, someday I’ll get out there again.
Was sad to see Ami Colé close up, but I may be more inclined to check out Skims than I was before.